We use cookies to ensure you get the best browsing experience. By continued use, you agree to our privacy policy and accept our use of such cookies. For further information, click FIND OUT MORE.
Make this your preferred source to get more updates from this publisher on Google.
Once upon a time, a friend was simply a friend. Gentlewomen and gentlemen, regardless of preference, could simply say so-and-so is a friend, a good friend, or an acquaintance. Not too long ago, the word âfriend" did not need to be clarified by the intriguing âwith or without benefits" or âuser-friendly." Time was when âItâs complicated" did not immediately hint at a vague romantic rollercoaster status that no party wants to confirm nor deny, and âNo Strings Attached" or NSA did not imply avoidance of the quirky post-bedroom emotional topography. In the not-so-distant past, a telephone was a heavy, black analog contraption solely used for talking, with calls labeled as either domestic or international. Roaming generally meant to wander about, totally unrelated to telephone communication. Back then, nobody thought that printed postcards delivered by bicycle-riding postmen would be the precursors of 21st century tweets. Today, a chic cellular phone smaller than a Cadbury chocolate bar contains almost one half of its ownerâs mental meditations, a list of contacts which used to be in a 10-inch Rolodex, photo albums that can rival a coffee table book, plus some functions of a laptop. Two decades after the first browsers went online in August 1991, try to discreetly eavesdrop in conversations among members of the generation more familiar with Web 2.0 than Michael Jacksonâs MTV hit Thriller or Madonnaâs Like a Virgin or the novel Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia Marquez. If one listens like Agatha Christieâs Hercule Poirot long enough, he or she is bound to hear these âdigital natives" discuss the taxonomy of their so-called friends thus: âa friend without benefits," âa friend with benefits," or simply âa Facebook friend." There is also the derogatory species under the genus of âuser-friendly friends." Against these tectonic shifts in the nomenclature of friends and the radical innovations in digital communication, award-winning director Erick C. Salud crafted Ligo na U, Lapit na Me (Star-Crossed Love), a love story of heterosexual adolescents who are âfriends with benefits but NSA."
Edgar Allan Guzman and Mercedes Cabral play the leads in this funny and thought-provoking movie. Courtesy of Cinemalaya 2011
As the 21st century Filipino adolescents grow more technologically savvy and digitally connected, Ligo na U, Lapit na Me seriously ponders on their socialization process and value formation. In one poignant scene, a confused Jenny tells Intoy that she is pregnant but immediately counters, âDonât worry, hindi naman sa iyo ito." A shocked Intoy must be asking himself: Is it too old-fashioned to be faithful to âfriends with benefits" these days? Is it wrong to be serially monogamous in this era? Viewers will have the answers to those questions in the sequel of Ligo na U, Lapit na Me which is already on the drawing board. - YA, GMA News