We use cookies to ensure you get the best browsing experience. By continued use, you agree to our privacy policy and accept our use of such cookies. For further information, click FIND OUT MORE.
âDuring the long span of time between March 1991 and October 1992, it was not physically impossible for the accused Webb to have returned to the Philippines, perpetrate the criminal act, and travel back to the US," part of the Pasay RTC ruling said. The Court of Appeals upheld the conviction in December 2005. Webb appealed the two rulings before the Supreme Court two years later. In April this year, the Supreme Court granted Webb's request for a DNA analysis and directed the NBI to produce the samples. But the NBI said the specimen was no longer with it because it was submitted to the Parañaque RTC when the case was still on trial. However, records of the trial court showed that what the NBI submitted were only photos of the DNA samples. Last Oct. 19, 2010, the Supreme Court said it would no longer require the conduct of a DNA analysis because the NBI could no longer produce the specimen. It also said the case is ready for resolution. Lauro Vizconde, widower and father of the victims, meanwhile, questioned the timing of Heafnerâs statement on Webbâs whereabouts. âSi Heafner, ang totoo niyan, sinubpoena ng court to testify. Pero hindi siya sumipot. Bakit (Heafter was subpoenaed by the court during the trial, but he did not show up. Why)?" Vizconde said in the same â24 Oras" report. Heafner also belied claims that the Webb family used their influence in the US to make it appear that Hubert was really there during the time of the Vizconde killings. âIn the US itâd be difficult for a foreigner having contact or influence with several government agencies," he said. âTo me thereâs no doubt that he (Hubert) was in the US at that time," he added. - KBK, GMANews.TV