ADVERTISEMENT
Filtered By: Topstories
News
Guingona defends release of unsigned Napoles affidavit
By ANDREO CALONZO, GMA News
Senator Teofisto Guingona III on Wednesday defended his decision to release to the media unsigned documents supposedly obtained by rehabilitation czar Panfilo Lacson from relatives of alleged pork barrel scam Janet Lim-Napoles.
In an interview, Guingona, Senate blue ribbon committee chairman, said there would have been public "backlash" if he did not release Napoles' unsigned affidavit and her supposed list of pork barrel conspirators.
"I don't think I had a choice. Could you imagine what could have happened if I kept it?" he told reporters.
"What is important is that we have a transparent process in finding out the truth," he added.
Guingona made these statements after Justice Secretary Leila de Lima said she was disappointed by how documents submitted by Lacson to the Senate were prematurely disclosed to the public.
De Lima also said that she is having second thoughts about submitting Napoles' official affidavit to Guingona's panel since this may also be released to the media.
But Guingona said he will also immediately release to the public documents to be submitted by De Lima to his committee.
"I don't see any reason why I should not. Can you imagine if I don't?" the senator said.
On Monday, the Senate blue ribbon committee compelled De Lima to submit Napoles' affidavit and her list of conspirators to the panel by Thursday.
'Scrap of paper'
Even Guingona's colleagues at the Senate did not give much weight to the documents he released to the media on Tuesday.
Senator Francis Escudero, who was mentioned in the so-called "Napolist" submitted by Lacson to the Senate, belittled Napoles' unsigned affidavit.
"It’s not an affidavit. It’s not signed. It’s not under oath. Right now from the evidentiary point of view, it’s a scrap of paper," Escudero said in a separate interview.
Napoles' draft affidavit should be immediately compared with the one in De Lima's possession, he added.
Escudero said he will grab the opportunity to ask questions on Napoles' list during the Senate probe on the misuse of Malampaya funds on May 22.
“Yung iimbitahan naman namin [sa next Senate hearing] ay ‘yung mga naimbitahan din sa hearing sa ‘pork’ scam. Di nila ako mapipigilang magtanong tungkol dito (Napolist) kahit tungkol pa sa Malampaya ang topic,” he told reporters on the sidelines of the joint congressional inquiry on the use of Yolanda rehabilitation funds.
De Lima has yet to turn over the list and affidavit she said was given to her by Napoles before the latter underwent an operation.
She said she is considering asking for an extension from the Senate panel—which issued a subpoena for the list—for her to submit the documents.
Committee chair Teofisto Guingona III has yet to release the guest list for the upcoming committee hearing as of posting time.
Escudero, who has earlier denied transacting with Napoles or with her NGOs, said he was no longer surprised about his inclusion in the list.
“Hindi na bago ang ganitong [pagba]balik sa akin ng akusasyon ng pinaiimbestigahan ng Senado. Normal na iyon at bahagi na ng trabaho ko ‘yun,” he said.
The existence of at least two different “Napolists,” Escudero noted, could be part of the trader’s ploy to confuse the public and muddle the investigation of the pork barrel scam.
“Binigay niya ang listahan sa iba’t ibang tao pero iisa ang utos niya: na huwag ilabas ito. Kung ako ang witness, isusumite ko ang affidavit ko sa Ombudsman… Definitely [wise] ang ginawa ni Napoles kasi napagulo niya ang sitwasyon at nagkakaturuan na,” he said.
Senator Aquilino "Koko" Pimentel III, who was also included in the "Napolist," meanwhile said that the documents in the possession of the Senate blue ribbon committee must be substantiated.
"We should spend our time on the evidence. Kapag nakita na, magfile na ng kaso. What is a list? It's just a list. Hindi pa sulat kamay. Print pa ng computer. Saan galing iyon? Hindi mo na alam," Pimentel said.
Earlier, Presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda said the unsigned list and affidavit from Napoles' camp submitted by Lacson to the Senate do not prove anything. — with Xianne Arcangel/RSJ/ELR, GMA News
More Videos
Most Popular