ADVERTISEMENT
Filtered By: Topstories
News
How the senator-judges voted in the Corona trial and why
+
Make this your preferred source to get more updates from this publisher on Google.
In the end, most of the senator-judges who voted for the conviction of Chief Justice Renato Corona became convinced of his guilt after he admitted having several undeclared dollar and peso accounts worth almost P200 million. Below are excerpts from the explanations of the senators for their votes.
GUILTY
Edgardo Angara
The Chief Justice himself openly admitted before this Court that he has four U.S. dollar accounts totaling U.S. $2.4 million, and three peso accounts of P80.7 million. I may grant the Chief Justice’s plea of honest mistake of judgment. But given his broad experience in public law and practice in investment advisory services, his willful and deliberate omission amounts to a culpable violation. Alan Peter Cayetano
Ito po ang tanong ko: Paano po kapag may kaso ang 1.3M civil servants, ilan man sa kanila, isa, dalawa,o marami sa Korte Suprema? Paano kung halatang halatang tinago lang ang pera pero dollar account ang ginamit? Will the Chief Justice have the moral ascendancy now to convict that public official? Hindi pwede. Dahil sa sarili niyang depensa, ginamit na niya ang interpretasyong ito. Pia Cayetano
In our interpretation of the law, we who hold a position of public trust must choose the interpretation that will uphold pubic interest over private interest. Regardless of whether malice or an intent to suppress the truth was present, we must remember that Public office is a public trust. Once that trust is gone, we must step down to preserve the integrity of the position we hold. Franklin Drilon
Chief Justice Corona knowingly, deliberately, and with malice aforethought, filed inaccurate and false SALNs to conceal his enormous wealth. Where our Constitution and our laws require disclosure, he chose the path of concealment. He has lost his moral fitness to serve the people. He has betrayed the public trust. Francis Escudero
Matapos aminin ni Chief Justice Corona na mayroon siyang $2.4M at P80M na hindi niya dineklara sa kanyang SALN, naging simple na lamang po ang kailangan naming pagpasyahan. Ito po ay: hindi nga ba ito kelangan ideklara dahil sa R.A. 6426 o FCDU law? Ikinalulungkot ko na di ko po masasang-ayunan ang posisyong ito ni Chief Justice Corona Jinggoy Estrada
It was argued by the defense panel that the non-inclusion of dollar deposits by the Chief Justice in his SALN was made in good faith and is covered by the provision of absolute confidentiality under the Foreign Currency Deposits Act. I regret to say that I am not convinced, because the Chief Justice is a learned man of law. Teofisto Guingona III
How could one man use the very same constitution which mandates full public disclosure to justify the concealment of millions of dollars in his personal bank accounts? This is Constitutional perversion in its ultimate form. Gregorio Honasan II
We have not proven if the defendant is corrupt or if he is malicious. What is clear is that based on the doubt cast on his capability to dispense justice and do his duty, he is no longer fit to preside over the highest court. Panfilo Lacson
If you ask me, so, what is the difference between $3.9 million and $2.4 million, between P91 million and P80.7 million? My answer is: a lot of money. One cannot simply learn from the lessons of the future. Even if the standards of moral fitness for such a lofty position in government were lowered, an acquittal may still be difficult to justify. Lito Lapid
Naawa po ako sa kanya. Akala ko totoo sinasabi niya, hindi pala. ’Yung sinasabi niyang pizza pie, hindi totoo yung 82 accounts ... [Pero] yun pong ipinrisinta ni Congressman Fariñas, malinaw na si chief justice ay lumabag sa batas. Ang ginagamit ko lang dito ay konsensya. Ako po ay representante ng masa rito. Loren Legarda
If we acquit the Chief Justice, we would tragically lift the floodgate for public suspicion and widespread distrust on the highest institution of our judicial system. We also lower the bar of public accountability of government officials. Sergio Osmeña III
If public officers had been dismissed from office for failing to declare far less remarkable and less valuable assets in their SALN’s, then there is more reason to apply the law when the assets in question amount to over P180 million. We should not penalize the poor man for stealing a bicycle but rule that the rich man must first steal a Mercedes to be penalized. Francis Pangilinan
Clearly the Chief Justice displayed a disturbing pattern of dishonesty, willful concealment, and evasion and a blatant and wanton disregard of the provisions of the Constitution on the SALN. Aquilino Pimentel III
The respondent has consistently misinterpreted all the laws as releasing him from his constitutional duty to disclose his entire assets in his SALN. The respondent never corrected his SALNs to reflect his true net worth. Ralph Recto
Logic dictates that we accept slight inaccuracies because if we leave no room for those, then, believe me, no government official will be left behind his desk. In the case of the Chief Justice’s SALN, the undeclared assets are so huge, 50 times more than what he declared in cash - 2.4 million in US dollar deposits, 80 million in peso deposits – that they cannot be brushed aside as innocent exclusions. Ramon Bong Revilla Jr 
In the end, I arrived [at the] conclusion that, through his own direct admission, the Chief Justice failed to properly disclose all of his assets in his SALN. This therefore has necessary consequences that attach to the position he holds in trust. Vicente Sotto III 

Ang tunay na hukom sa paglilitis na ito ay ang taong bayan. Nadinig nila ang dalawang panig. Tulad namin, hindi sila abogado, ngunit ang kapangyarihan ng demokrasya ay nasa kanilang mga kamay. In my conscience, I have heard their decision and therefore I vote guilty. Antonio Trillanes IV
It is in the best interest of the country to convict Chief Justice Renato Corona. A conviction signifies that transparency and accountability take precedence over legal technicalities. A conviction also signifies that our system of checks and balance is working well and that Impeachment can now be effectively used as a tool of the state to make high government officials accountable for their actions. Manuel Villar
Ang isyu po dito ay kung dapat idineklara sa SALN ang dollar deposits. Sa dami-dami po ng sinabi, doon lamang nalimita ang isyu at dito po kami halos lahat gumawa ng desisyon. Sapagkat hindi naman po namin matanggap na hindi kailangang ideklara ang FCDU account. Juan Ponce Enrile
I believe it is our duty to resolve this [moral] “dilemma” in favor of upholding the law and sound public policy. If we were to agree with the Respondent that he was correct in not disclosing the value of his foreign currency deposits because they are absolutely confidential, can we ever expect any SALN to be filed by public officials from hereon to be more accurate and true than they are today?
This is not justice, political or legal. This is certainly not law. For sure, it is not the law of the Constitution; it is only naked power as it was in 1972.
It is in the best interest of the country to convict Chief Justice Renato Corona. A conviction signifies that transparency and accountability take precedence over legal technicalities. A conviction also signifies that our system of checks and balance is working well and that Impeachment can now be effectively used as a tool of the state to make high government officials accountable for their actions. Manuel Villar
Ang isyu po dito ay kung dapat idineklara sa SALN ang dollar deposits. Sa dami-dami po ng sinabi, doon lamang nalimita ang isyu at dito po kami halos lahat gumawa ng desisyon. Sapagkat hindi naman po namin matanggap na hindi kailangang ideklara ang FCDU account. Juan Ponce Enrile
I believe it is our duty to resolve this [moral] “dilemma” in favor of upholding the law and sound public policy. If we were to agree with the Respondent that he was correct in not disclosing the value of his foreign currency deposits because they are absolutely confidential, can we ever expect any SALN to be filed by public officials from hereon to be more accurate and true than they are today? NOT GUILTY
Joker Arroyo
This is not justice, political or legal. This is certainly not law. For sure, it is not the law of the Constitution; it is only naked power as it was in 1972. Miriam Defensor-Santiago
An omission in good faith in the SALN carries a light penalty, and is even allowed to be corrected. Thus, it is not impeachable. The Constitution simply provides that a public officer shall submit a declaration under oath of his assets, liabilities, and net worth. That is all. There are no details. Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
In view of the ambiguous situation created by the concurrent application of the 1987 Constitution, the SALN law, and the FCDU law, and absent a determinative judicial pronouncement that resolves the contrary positions on this legal issue, the Chief Justice must be presumed to have acted in good faith. - Kimberly Jane Tan & Yasmin Arquiza, GMA News
An omission in good faith in the SALN carries a light penalty, and is even allowed to be corrected. Thus, it is not impeachable. The Constitution simply provides that a public officer shall submit a declaration under oath of his assets, liabilities, and net worth. That is all. There are no details. Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
In view of the ambiguous situation created by the concurrent application of the 1987 Constitution, the SALN law, and the FCDU law, and absent a determinative judicial pronouncement that resolves the contrary positions on this legal issue, the Chief Justice must be presumed to have acted in good faith. - Kimberly Jane Tan & Yasmin Arquiza, GMA NewsMore Videos
Most Popular