At one point during the long 14-year martial law period, someone described the Filipino people as 47 million cowards led by one son of a bitch. For most of the martial law years, I was one of those 47 million cowards. But thanks to my mother and my daughters, I was part of the peaceful EDSA revolution that defeated martial law and ousted the hated President Marcos, his family and his cronies. Like most middle class Filipinos, at first I was defiant, then I learned to live with the rules, albeit restlessly, until the long arm of the dictatorship struck at my home, and I found that I had it in me to fight a powerful dictator.

FINDING HER VOICE. A journalist recounts her journey from silence to protest. Illustration by Analyn Perez
Waking up to martial law on September 23, 1972, and realizing that the government had taken over my newspaper and jailed my editors, I was seething. Trying to enter the Chronicle building on that Saturday morning, I hissed at the armed soldiers guarding the padlocked doors. Back in the car, I shouted invectives at them as we drove away. So this was martial law. It had been the subject of much speculation for several weeks. Ninoy Aquino even delivered a privilege speech warning against it in the Senate just a couple of days before. We would find out later in the day that President Marcos had actually signed the decree declaring martial law on September 21 but the order to start implementing it came only on the evening of September 22. And the announcement by the press secretary, Francisco âKitâ Tatad, came on September 23. The leaders of the opposition were rounded up, along with activists, intellectuals, journalists and other critics of Marcos. They would remain behind bars for weeks, months, and in the case of Ninoy Aquino, seven years and seven months. Friends and family who feared they were on the âlist" scampered for safety, looking for safe havens from the dreaded agents of the state. In an attempt to fit in with the rest of society, activists shed their long hair for neat crew-cuts, discarded their Mao jackets and caps, and tucked in their shirts. I remember running into the firebrand Behn Cervantes and barely recognizing him with his short hair, and wearing slacks and a long sleeved shirt that made him look like an Ayala executive. I helped when and who I could, sending fruitcakes and cookies to those in detention at Christmastime, and housing, aiding and abetting people who opted to fight the dictatorship by going underground. It was the least I could do to get back at the regime that robbed me of my job, and our people, of our freedoms. A new newspaper cropped up using the facilities of the Chronicle, but it was owned by Imelda Marcosâ brother, and although I needed a job badly, I refused to apply, opting to change careers rather than buckle down to writing paeans to the dictator. But in time, I got used to martial law. Although life was just humdrum, it didnât seem that bad. There was order in the streets and criminality seemed to be under control. I was offered a job in government drafting memos and speeches for the Secretary of Agriculture, Bong Tanco, who was a family friend. It was good work; I was well paid as part of a bright group of young MBAs and fresh college graduates called the Management Staff. We worked hard, had the opportunity to travel abroad, played hard, and partied a lot, coming home at dawn, protected by curfew passes that government officials and their underlings were entitled to. But there was something forced, desperate even, about our revelry. To me, it was as if the loud music, the liquor, and the occasional drag on a joint were my passport to oblivion. There was much I had to forget if I was to continue serving a boss I loved in a system I despised. Later, I was asked to co-edit Goodman, a bi-monthly magazine published by a multinational. It was a sleek award-winning publication that many writers wanted to be part of. It should have been a dream come true to a journalist like myself, but we had to make sure we published only safe, non-political stories, and soon, even that got old.
(My mother's arrest next page) Then early morning on Christmas Eve in 1979, I was stunned to hear that my mother, Ester Misa Jimenez, and stepfather, Otto Jimenez, had been arrested the night before. The Metrocom had raided my parentsâ home, dug up the yard and took them, their cars and other valuables from the house. I was told that my feisty mom had insisted on driving herself to Camp Crame rather than ride a police vehicle. I was frightened. I had no idea what the arrest was about. It was hard to believe the Metrocomâs allegation that my mother had plotted against the life of the dictator. They mentioned other names of prominent academics and politicians here and abroad who were allegedly in on the plot. As the story unfolded, my siblings and I realized that our mother did join the Light-a-Fire movement, a group of middle class professionals who sought to destabilize the dictatorship by planting bombs in government buildings and in properties owned by Marcos cronies, lighting fires in places like the Comelec office, the Floating Casino and Sulo Hotel. âWhy, Mom?" we asked, incredulous. âWhy not?" she replied defiantly. âMartial law has gone on long enough. Somebody had to do something."
My politicization was swift and thorough. With my mother in detention, I became an advocate of freedom for political prisoners.
She said that when she saw how young people who had joined the underground were willing to give up their lives to restore our freedoms, she felt ashamed of her normal and comfortable life. My motherâs actuations shocked me back to reality and my life would not be the same again. I joined a group of writers who called ourselves WOMEN for Women Writers in Media Now. Meeting every Saturday at the Heritage Art Gallery in Cubao, initially to discuss the craft of writing, we soon became a coven of sisters in the craft who wrote tirelessly about the issues of the day and worked for the restoration of our other freedoms. My motherâs detention gave me access to the political prisoners in Bicutan and Camp Crame, from whom I learned about torture, harassment, rape, salvaging, and other atrocities experienced by dissenters at the hands of martial law authorities. I read Amnesty International reports, viewed documentaries and distributed copies of reports in foreign newspapers about the abuses, the ostentation and the corruption of the Marcos dictatorship. My politicization was swift and thorough. With my mother in detention, I became an advocate of freedom for political prisoners. Ninoyâs murder in 1983, followed by the rallies and marches in Makati and Manila saw me fund raising, making placards, drafting manifestos, organizing, networking, writing articles, editing â doing whatever needed to be done. In 1984, on a journalism fellowship at Stanford University, I became a voice for the restoration of press freedom and democracy, and freedom for political prisoners in the Philippines. I spoke at forums and lectured in some classes at the university, attended meetings of the opposition, and even went to Washington to lobby the Philippine desk at the State Department. At the end of that year, my mother and her group were sentenced to death by firing squad by a military court. Things were really going badly at home and when my fellowship was ending in June 1985, the idea of seeking political asylum in the US came up at the dinner table, to which my two daughters, then aged 13 and 9, replied, âMom, you said weâd only be here for a year. We have political prisoners to free. We have a country to save." Back home, I reported on the events that led to Marcosâ call for snap elections, Cory Aquinoâs campaign for the presidency, the elections and its aftermath, and finally, the four amazing days on EDSA that led to the ouster of Marcos, his family and cronies, and the end of martial rule. It was hard to believe that the stand-off on EDSA was over in just four days. Thirty-seven years after the imposition of martial law and 23 years after EDSA, we are constantly reminded that little has changed in our society and government after we ousted the dictator, that the restoration of democracy has only brought us bad governance, shameless power tripping, unmitigated corruption, politics as usual. There are even some who are willing to experiment once more with martial rule, if only to impose discipline in our people. But the 14 years of Marcosâ martial law taught us that it is not the people who need disciplining, it is our leaders who are so easily corrupted by power. What our people need is not more discipline, but more democracy, deeper involvement, a broader exercise of people power to counteract the power of elected officials. An awakened citizenry is the best foil to a corrupt leader, or to anyone who would try to perpetuate himself in power by imposing one-man (or one-woman) rule. An apathetic public allowed Marcos to get away with it in 1972, but we finally mustered enough strength and courage to give him his walking papers in 1986. We did it once, and we will do it again should the situation call for it. GMANews.TV